🔗 Nexus · Supply chain, AP & contract reconciliation

Find the break.
Name the owner. Close the loop.

Nexus reads every document in a transaction — purchase order, receipt, bill of lading, invoice, contract — and reconciles it against the rest of the file and against your ERP. Conflicts, duplicate payments, fraud signals and missed obligations surface with a dollar value, an owner and a deadline.

PO-4471 · Bergstrom Industrial
Three-way match · Oracle ERP
Reconciling
99%
PO match accuracy
Invoice to PO to receipt, 12 match dimensions
73%
Resolved without a human
Documents scoring ≥90% extraction confidence
10
Pre-built source channels
Oracle, SAP Ariba, Coupa, NetSuite, EDI and more
6×
Faster dispute resolution
Against the manual baseline it replaced

Drawn from internal pilots and reference implementations. Results vary with document quality, vendor mix and the state of your master data — we size it against your own history before you commit to anything.

What Aurus does

Read it. Reconcile it. Route it. Close it.

Aurus.ai turns unstructured documents — invoices, receipts, bills of lading, scans, contracts and paper — into clean, ERP-grade structured data, then reconciles that data against the rest of the file and against your system of record, names every conflict, duplicate and missed obligation it finds, assigns an owner and a deadline, and tracks it until someone closes it.

What this costs you today

The money does not leak where you are looking

Your team matches POs to invoices to receipts by hand. Mismatches stall payments, exceptions pile up, and staff spend the close chasing paperwork. Meanwhile Oracle says one thing, Ariba says another, and the spreadsheet says a third — so nobody can prove which is right.

$18.50
Per invoice, keyed by hand

The same invoice re-entered into three to five disconnected systems, each keystroke a chance to introduce the variance somebody will chase next month.

4+ hrs
To clear one exception

Finding the right documents, emailing the vendor, waiting, re-checking. The queue grows faster than the team clears it, and SLA debt compounds quietly.

2.8%
Of AP spend paid twice

Duplicate payments typically surface 60 to 90 days later, if they surface at all. By then the vendor relationship, not the control, is what recovers the money.

0
Defensible audit trail

The record of who approved what, and on what evidence, lives in email threads. When an auditor asks, reconstructing it costs weeks of somebody senior.

How a document moves

Six stages, and every one of them is inspectable

A document arriving by email at 2am and an EDI 810 from a tier-one supplier follow the same path. Anything that fails a stage goes to a dead-letter queue for human review instead of blocking everything behind it.

Ingest

Email attachments, EDI, cloud storage, ERP exports, API hooks and manual uploads normalise into one queue. No provider change, no second inbox.

500 docs/min peak
Classify

Document type, vendor, PO reference and schema identified automatically by a model registry that selects the right variant on confidence.

≥85% threshold
Extract

27 or more fields per document. Fields below threshold are isolated and routed for review rather than written downstream on a guess.

93.2% avg confidence
Validate

Schema rules, business logic and cross-checks against the system of record run before the document is allowed near the matching queue.

Duplicate detection
Reconcile

Invoices matched to POs, receipts, bills of lading and payment records on a weighted score across 12 dimensions, anchored to the purchase order.

99% match accuracy
Dispose

Every break gets a severity, a financial exposure, an owner and a deadline. It stays open and escalating until somebody closes it.

Tracked to close
The architecture that makes it work

Every document has to trace back to a purchase order

Most AP tools anchor on the invoice, which is why a ghost invoice with a plausible vendor name gets paid. Nexus anchors on the purchase order and treats every downstream document as a leaf that must resolve back to a PO line item.

The data model enforces it structurally. A PO core layer is populated from Oracle or SAP and held as the immutable reference. Every transaction record — receipt, bill of lading, carrier invoice, customs declaration, AP invoice, payment — carries a mandatory link back to a PO line. Nothing orphaned can enter the system, which removes the single largest source of duplicate and fraudulent payment in one design decision rather than through a rules engine somebody has to maintain.

If it cannot be traced to a purchase order, it cannot be entered. That is a property of the schema, not a policy somebody can override under month-end pressure.
Root · system of record
PO-4471
Oracle ERP · 1,200 units · $22,080 · Net 45
GRN
Goods receipt · 1,140 units · warehouse confirmed
BOL
Bill of lading · EDI 856 · 3 pallets
Invoice
EDI 810 · billed 1,200 at $19.10 · conflict
POD
Proof of delivery · signed 12 Sep
Carrier
Freight invoice · rated against contract
Payment
Held pending exception closure
What ships

Five modules on one data model

Each module deploys independently, but they share a single schema — so a contract clause, a goods receipt and a payment record are queryable against each other rather than sitting in separate products that integrate badly.

Reconciliation engine

AP Intelligence

Matches invoices to purchase orders on a weighted score across twelve dimensions — vendor identity, amount, date, PO number, line items, tax, currency, payment terms and more — rather than a single fuzzy string comparison.

  • Three-way match with named, categorised variance
  • Duplicate detection on content hash and fuzzy similarity
  • Vendor scorecard drives auto-approval thresholds
Supply chain

Nexus Supply Chain

Extends the match beyond the invoice into physical movement: receipts against bills of lading, carrier invoices against contracted rates, free-time windows against actual gate-out.

  • Demurrage and detention validated against the service contract
  • Carrier invoice reconciliation with dispute evidence chains
  • Supplier performance and risk scoring over time
Integration

ERP Bridge

Most document tools only read from your ERP. Nexus writes back — approved invoices published as validated AP vouchers into Oracle and SAP, with rollback if the write fails.

  • Golden record publication, bi-directional
  • Vendor master de-duplicated across systems of record
  • PO amendments cascaded to every open transaction
Governance

Workflow Studio

A visual approval-chain designer your admins use directly. Drag nodes, set the assigned role, the SLA in hours, what happens on breach, what happens on rejection. No code, no support ticket.

  • Published versions are frozen and immutable
  • Past transactions always cite the version that governed them
  • Five flows ship ready: invoice approval, exception resolution, vendor onboarding, PO amendment, payment release
Contracts

Contract Intelligence

Reads the agreement package together — master agreement, amendments, exhibits, schedules — and holds the commercial terms as the reference that invoices and carrier charges are checked against.

  • Rebate thresholds, price protections and volume tiers tracked against actual spend
  • Superseded provisions flagged when someone relies on them
  • Threaded comments, redline review and sign-off held on the document until it is fully executed
Operations

Exception Intelligence

An exception is not a flag with a confidence score attached. It is categorised, scored for financial exposure, assigned to a role, and measured on how long it took to clear.

  • Routed by the active workflow, not by whoever is watching the queue
  • Resolution velocity tracked per category and per owner
  • Outcomes fed back into model tuning
Where it runs

One engine, four places the documents decide the money

The reconciliation logic does not change between these. What changes is which documents are the reference and which breaks matter — configured at deployment rather than rebuilt.

Finance and accounts payable

Three-way match without the chase

Your team stops matching POs to invoices to receipts by hand. Nexus reconciles automatically, names every break in plain terms, and assigns it to the person who can clear it — so the close is not spent chasing paperwork.

  • Price and quantity variance isolated to the line, not the document
  • Duplicate invoices caught on content hash before payment, not after
  • Payment terms and tax treatment checked against the contract
  • Approved vouchers written back to Oracle or SAP automatically
Logistics and freight

Charges validated against the contract you signed

Demurrage applied incorrectly, detention billed past free time, rates that do not match the service contract. Nexus reads the bill of lading, the terminal record and the carrier invoice together and disputes what is not owed.

  • Free-time windows checked against actual gate-out
  • Accessorials rated against the contracted tariff
  • Dispute letters auto-drafted with the evidence chain attached
  • Claim status tracked to recovery, not just to submission
Manufacturing and process industries

The receipt, the certificate and the batch record agree

Incoming material arrives with a certificate of analysis, a packing list and a receipt that all have to reconcile against the purchase order and the specification before the lot is released.

  • Supplier certificates of analysis checked against the material specification
  • Batch records and manufacturing logbooks read for missing or out-of-sequence entries
  • Short shipments and substitutions surfaced at receipt, not at production
  • Supplier performance scored on quality and documentation over time
Attorney offices and professional firms

Review that moves in hours, with a defensible record

Where a matter is a stack of documents that have to agree with each other, Nexus reads the whole file, surfaces where it contradicts itself, and holds the collaboration until the package is signed off.

  • Obligations and deadlines extracted from the package, not just the master document
  • Threaded comments and redline review on the document itself
  • Sign-off tracked per party until the package is fully executed
  • Every finding traced to the clause it came from
When the AI is unsure

Confidence decides the routing, not the outcome

Every document gets an overall confidence score weighted by field criticality — amount, vendor identity and PO number carry the most weight. The score determines who looks at it. It never determines whether something gets written to your ERP unchecked.

Confidence band Share of volume What happens
≥ 90% 73% Matched, validated and promoted automatically. No human review unless a business rule fires.
75–89% 18% Partially matched. Only the uncertain fields are highlighted, so a reviewer checks three fields rather than re-reading the document.
< 75% 9% Quarantined in the exception queue with the model's annotation. Human review required before anything is written to a system of record.

Document types and extraction performance

Document type Model Fields extracted Average confidence
Tax invoiceAURUS-AP-INV-v33194.2%
Purchase orderAURUS-AP-PO-v22896.1%
Goods receipt noteAURUS-SC-GRN-v22293.8%
Bill of ladingAURUS-SC-BOL-v11991.4%
EDI 810 invoiceAURUS-EDI-810-v43899.1%
EDI 850 purchase orderAURUS-EDI-850-v43499.3%
Credit noteAURUS-AP-CN-v22492.7%
Remittance adviceAURUS-AP-REM-v11890.2%
Proof of deliveryAURUS-SC-POD-v11588.9%

Confidence figures are rolling averages from production and pilot document volumes. New document types are trained against your own historical documents during onboarding.

Connectivity

Ten source channels, no middleware, no ERP customisation

Every connector is governed by a configuration-driven registry that holds the field mappings, sync frequency, authentication and retry policy. Adding a source is configuration, not a project.

Source system Connection
Oracle ERP · AP and financeREST API · OAuth 2.0 · bi-directional · real time
SAP Ariba · procurementREST API · API key · bi-directional · scheduled
Coupa · invoice managementWebhook · OAuth 2.0 · push events
NetSuiteSuiteQL REST · OAuth 1.0a · bi-directional
EDI GatewayAS2 · EDI 810 / 850 / 856 / 997 · ANSI X12
Email listenerIMAP/SMTP · attachment extraction · rule-based routing
Google Drive, SharePoint, Box, OneDriveOAuth 2.0 · folder watch · delta sync
Custom API or webhookInbound REST · HMAC auth · JSON, XML or EDI payload

EDI transaction sets, with acknowledgement

Set Purpose Direction Acknowledgement
810InvoiceInbound from vendor997 functional ack
850Purchase orderOutbound to vendor997 + 855 PO ack
856Advance ship noticeInbound from vendor997
820Payment remittanceOutbound to vendor—
855PO acknowledgementInbound997
997Functional acknowledgementBi-directional—
The difference

Extraction is the easy half

Pulling fields off a page is close to a commodity. What still costs you money is everything that happens after the fields come out — and that is where most tools hand the work back to your team.

Capability Typical AP automation Nexus
Reads and classifies the documentYesYes
Extracts structured fieldsYesYes
Delivers to a queue or systemYesYes
Anchors every record to a purchase orderNoYes
Reconciles against the system of recordNoYes
Reads the contract package as the referenceNoYes
Assigns an owner and an SLA per exceptionNoYes
Escalates when the SLA is breachedNoYes
Writes golden records back to the ERPNoYes
Tracks to disposition, not just deliveryNoYes

The comparison describes the category as it is generally marketed. Individual products vary — verify against any specific tool you are evaluating.

Inside the platform

The surfaces your team actually works in

Beyond the ingestion, matching and reconciliation workbenches that run the pipeline above, each role gets the console that fits what they do. Every one of them writes to the same audit log.

Exception Queue
Every break, scored for financial exposure, owned and on a clock
Convergence Queue
Transactions waiting on a downstream document that has not arrived
Purchase Order Dashboard
The PO tree with every child document attached and its status
Invoice Detail
Field-level confidence shown beside the source page it came from
Vendor Detail
Scorecard, dispute history and the auto-approval threshold it earns
Vendor Resolution
Merge duplicate vendor records that exist in more than one system
Master Data Resolver
Reconcile conflicting master data held in two ERPs at once
ERP Conflict Queue
Where systems of record disagree, and the rule that decides which wins
SOT Publisher
Promote a validated record to the source of truth, with rollback
Document Vault
Every original, versioned, searchable and retention-governed
Client Admin Console
Users, roles, security policy and the Workflow Studio designer
Reports
Spend intelligence, vendor risk and resolution velocity over time
Control and evidence

Your admins configure it. Your auditors can replay it.

Identity, access, retention and security policy are all set at the organisation level from the admin console — no backend access and no support ticket. Every login, approval, rejection, configuration change, export and API call is written to an immutable log.

Access

Role-based permissions

  • Separate roles for AP Manager, Finance Controller, Underwriter, Loan Officer and Client Admin
  • ERP Bridge configuration, user management, billing, security policy and full audit log reserved to Client Admin
  • Sensitive vendor fields — bank account, tax ID — masked below Controller level
  • Bulk exports can require admin approval above a configurable row threshold
Identity

Authentication policy

  • SAML 2.0 and OIDC single sign-on: Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, ADFS, PingIdentity
  • MFA enforcement via TOTP, SMS or FIDO2/WebAuthn for non-SSO users
  • Password length, expiry, history, complexity and breach detection
  • Session timeout, inactivity lock, concurrent session caps, IP allowlist by CIDR range
Compliance

Certifications and data protection

  • SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, CSA STAR Level 2, GDPR ready
  • AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit, field-level encryption for PII
  • Customer-managed keys available on the enterprise tier
  • Data residency in the United States, EU, Canada or Australia, chosen at onboarding
  • Audit log retention configurable from one to seven years, exportable
The business case

Five cost levers, one payback window

The savings come from eliminating manual keying, cutting exception overhead, preventing duplicate payments, reducing audit cost, and retiring the integration maintenance that custom ERP connections demand every year.

Cost category What drives it today Typical reduction
Manual invoice processingKeying the same invoice into three to five systems85%
Exception resolution overheadHours per break, spent finding documents and chasing vendors85%
Duplicate payment lossesPaid twice, surfaced 60 to 90 days later if at all83%
Audit and complianceReconstructing who approved what, and on what evidence89%
ERP integration maintenanceCustom connections rebuilt after every upgrade85%

Your numbers, not ours

Payback typically lands inside the first year. What that is worth depends entirely on your document volume, vendor mix and loaded cost per invoice — so we build the model against your own figures rather than publishing someone else's. Bring one month of documents and we will show you the arithmetic, including what it costs.

Build my model

Reduction percentages are drawn from internal pilots and reference implementations, measured against the manual baselines they replaced. They are not a guarantee of your result and will vary with document quality, vendor mix and the state of your master data. Beyond direct savings, implementations typically also see days payable outstanding fall by around eleven days.

Getting live

Nothing is switched off until it has been proven in parallel

The delivery model is deliberately low risk. Your existing process keeps running through the whole of phase one, and no ERP customisation is required at any stage. Commercial deployments on the platform typically stand up in weeks, not quarters.

Months 1–6

Foundation

  • Environment, single sign-on and user onboarding
  • Oracle and SAP Ariba connectors configured and tested
  • All ten ingestion channels activated
  • Models benchmarked against your own historical documents
  • Invoice approval and exception workflows published
  • Four-week parallel run, results compared line by line
Months 6–8

Go-live

  • All new invoices processed exclusively through Nexus
  • Exception queue replaces email-based exception handling
  • ERP write-back enabled for approved invoices
  • AP managers trained, client admin certified
Months 9–12

Optimisation

  • Supply chain reconciliation activated: receipts, bills of lading, carrier invoices
  • Spend intelligence and vendor risk dashboards
  • Optional supplier self-service portal
  • Confidence baselines reviewed, models retrained on production data

Every implementation includes a named customer success manager and a ninety-day hypercare period after go-live, with a four-hour response SLA on P1 issues.

Before you start

The questions operations leaders ask first

Do we have to replace our ERP or change how vendors send us documents?
No. Nexus sits on top of the systems you already run and the channels your vendors already use — email, EDI, portals, cloud storage. There is no migration, no middleware layer, and no ERP customisation at any phase of the rollout.
What happens when the AI gets something wrong?
Low-confidence documents are quarantined before anything is written to a system of record, and the specific uncertain fields are surfaced rather than the whole document being handed back. Every automated decision is reversible and logged with the model version that made it. The design bias is toward sending you something to check rather than quietly getting it wrong.
How is this different from the AP automation we already evaluated?
Two structural differences. First, Nexus anchors on the purchase order rather than the invoice, so an orphaned document cannot enter the system at all — which removes the main route for duplicate and fraudulent payment. Second, it writes back to your ERP rather than only reading from it, so approved records become validated vouchers in Oracle or SAP without anybody re-keying them.
Who owns an exception once it is raised?
Whoever the active workflow says owns it. Your admins design that in Workflow Studio: assigned role, SLA in hours, what happens on breach, what happens on rejection. Once published, that version is frozen, so any transaction can be replayed against the exact rules that governed it at the time.
Can it handle contracts as well as transactional documents?
Yes, and it treats them as the reference rather than as another document type. The master agreement, its amendments and its exhibits are read together, and the commercial terms extracted from them — rebate thresholds, contracted rates, free-time windows, price protections — become what invoices and carrier charges are checked against. Review, comment threads and sign-off stay on the document until it is fully executed.
How is it priced?
By document volume across three tiers, not per seat, so adding staff never costs more. Tiers differ on document credits, number of connected source systems, workflow count, ERP write-back, EDI gateway, custom model training and uptime SLA. Enterprise pricing is set against your document volume, source count and deployment complexity, with a discount on multi-year terms.
How quickly can we see it working on our own documents?
Bring one month of real documents — invoices, POs, receipts, a contract package — and we will run them and show you what was matched, what broke, and what it would have cost you. If the answer is not obviously better than what you do now, we will tell you.
One platform

Same engine underneath. Different jobs on top of it.

Nexus is where documents decide money. Lexara is where they decide risk. Both run on the reconciliation engine described above.

Bring us one month of documents.

We will reconcile them against your purchase orders and your system of record, and show you exactly what broke, what it was worth, and who should have caught it.